Systems and methods for surface modeling using polarization cues

ABSTRACT

A computer-implemented method for surface modeling includes: receiving one or more polarization raw frames of a surface of a physical object, the polarization raw frames being captured with a polarizing filter at different linear polarization angles; extracting one or more first tensors in one or more polarization representation spaces from the polarization raw frames; and detecting a surface characteristic of the surface of the physical object based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/266,054 filed Feb. 4, 2021, which is a U.S. National Phase Patent Application of International Application Number PCT/US2020/051243, filed on Sep. 17, 2020, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/901,731, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Sep. 17, 2019 and which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/001,445, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Mar. 29, 2020, the entire disclosures of each of which is incorporated by reference herein.

FIELD

Aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to the field of computer vision and the modeling of surfaces of objects using machine vision.

BACKGROUND

Large scale surface modeling is often desirable in manufacturing for a variety of reasons. One area of use is in the manufacturing of automobiles and automotive parts, where surface modeling using computer vision or machine vision provides methods for automated inspection of the scanned surfaces, which may improve efficiency and result in cost reduction in manufacturing.

Large scale surface modeling may also be applied in other contexts, such as laboratory work and inspection of individual workpieces outside of large scale manufacturing.

1 SUMMARY

Aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to surface modeling by using light polarization (e.g., the rotation of light waves) to provide additional channels of information to the process of characterizing the surfaces of objects. Aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure may be applied in scenarios such as manufacturing, where surface characterization is used to perform object inspection as a component of a quality assurance process, such as detecting defective goods produced on a manufacturing line and removing or repairing those defective objects.

According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, a computer-implemented method for surface modeling includes: receiving one or more polarization raw frames of a surface of a physical object, the polarization raw frames being captured at different polarizations by a polarization camera including a polarizing filter; extracting one or more first tensors in one or more polarization representation spaces from the polarization raw frames; and detecting a surface characteristic of the surface of the physical object based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.

The one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces may include: a degree of linear polarization (DOLP) image in a DOLP representation space; and an angle of linear polarization (AOLP) image in an AOLP representation space.

The one or more first tensors may further include one or more non-polarization tensors in one or more non-polarization representation spaces, and the one or more non-polarization tensors may include one or more intensity images in intensity representation space.

The one or more intensity images may include: a first color intensity image; a second color intensity image; and a third color intensity image.

The surface characteristic may include a detection of a defect in the surface of the physical object.

The detecting the surface characteristic may include: loading a stored model corresponding to a location of the surface of the physical object; and computing the surface characteristic in accordance with the stored model and the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.

The stored model may include one or more reference tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces, and the computing the surface characteristic may include computing a difference between the one or more reference tensors and the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.

The difference may be computed using a Fresnel distance.

The stored model may include a reference three-dimensional mesh, and the computing the surface characteristic may include: computing a three-dimensional point cloud of the surface of the physical object based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces; and computing a difference between the three-dimensional point cloud and the reference three-dimensional mesh.

The stored model may include a trained statistical model configured to compute a prediction of the surface characteristic based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.

The trained statistical model may include an anomaly detection model.

The trained statistical model may include a convolutional neural network trained to detect defects in the surface of the physical object.

The trained statistical model may include a trained classifier trained to detect defects.

According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, a system for surface modeling includes: a polarization camera including a polarizing filter, the polarization camera being configured to capture polarization raw frames at different polarizations; and a processing system including a processor and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: receive one or more polarization raw frames of a surface of a physical object, the polarization raw frames corresponding to different polarizations of light; extract one or more first tensors in one or more polarization representation spaces from the polarization raw frames; and detect a surface characteristic of the surface of the physical object based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.

The one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces may include: a degree of linear polarization (DOLP) image in a DOLP representation space; and an angle of linear polarization (AOLP) image in an AOLP representation space.

The one or more first tensors may further include one or more non-polarization tensors in one or more non-polarization representation spaces, and the one or more non-polarization tensors may include one or more intensity images in intensity representation space.

The one or more intensity images may include: a first color intensity image; a second color intensity image; and a third color intensity image.

The surface characteristic may include a detection of a defect in the surface of the physical object.

The memory may further store instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to detect the surface characteristic by: loading a stored model corresponding to a location of the surface of the physical object; and computing the surface characteristic in accordance with the stored model and the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.

The stored model may include one or more reference tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces, and the memory may further store instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to compute the surface characteristic by computing a difference between the one or more reference tensors and the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.

The difference may be computed using a Fresnel distance.

The stored model may include a reference three-dimensional mesh, and the memory may further store instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to compute the surface characteristic by: computing a three-dimensional point cloud of the surface of the physical object based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces; and computing a difference between the three-dimensional point cloud and the reference three-dimensional mesh.

The stored model may include a trained statistical model configured to compute a prediction of the surface characteristic based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.

The trained statistical model may include an anomaly detection model.

The trained statistical model may include a convolutional neural network trained to detect defects in the surface of the physical object.

The trained statistical model may include a trained classifier trained to detect defects.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, together with the specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the present invention, and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 1A is a schematic depiction of surfaces of an object (e.g., an automobile) under inspection by a surface characterization system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 1B is a schematic block diagram of a surface characterization system according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2A is an image or intensity image of a scene with one real transparent ball placed on top of a printout of photograph depicting another scene containing two transparent balls (“spoofs”) and some background clutter.

FIG. 2B depicts the intensity image of FIG. 2A with an overlaid segmentation mask as computed by a Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) identifying instances of transparent balls, where the real transparent ball is correctly identified as an instance, and the two spoofs are incorrectly identified as instances.

FIG. 2C is an angle of polarization image computed from polarization raw frames captured of the scene according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2D depicts the intensity image of FIG. 2A with an overlaid segmentation mask as computed using polarization data in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, where the real transparent ball is correctly identified as an instance and the two spoofs are correctly excluded as instances.

FIG. 3 is a high-level depiction of the interaction of light with transparent objects and non-transparent (e.g., diffuse and/or reflective) objects.

FIG. 4 is a graph of the energy of light that is transmitted versus reflected over a range of incident angles to a surface having a refractive index of approximately 1.5.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of processing circuit 100 for computing surface characterization outputs based on polarization data according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a method for performing surface characterization based on input images to compute a surface characterization output according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7A is a block diagram of a feature extractor according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7B is a flowchart depicting a method according to one embodiment of the present invention for extracting features from polarization raw frames.

FIG. 8A is a block diagram of a predictor according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8B is a flowchart depicting a method according to one embodiment of the present invention for detecting characteristics of surfaces of objects.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description, only certain exemplary embodiments of the present invention are shown and described, by way of illustration. As those skilled in the art would recognize, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Like reference numerals designate like elements throughout the specification.

As used herein, the term “surface modeling” refers to capturing information about the surfaces of real-world objects, such as the three-dimensional shape of the surface, and may also include capturing color (or “texture”) information about the surface and other information about the reflectivity of the surface (e.g., a bidirectional reflectance distribution function or BRDF).

Surface profile examination is important in analyzing the intrinsic shape and curvature properties or characteristics of surfaces. Surface modeling of real-world objects has applications in many areas in which the characterization of surfaces is desired. For example, in manufacturing, surface modeling may be used to perform inspection of the objects produced through the manufacturing process, thereby enabling the detection of defects in the objects (or manufactured goods or workpieces) and removal of those defective objects from the manufacturing stream. One area of use is in the manufacturing of automobiles and automotive parts, such as in the automatic detection of defective automotive parts, where a computer vision or machine vision system captures images of the automotive parts (e.g., using one or more cameras) and generates a classification result and/or other detection information regarding the quality of the part, such as whether a window is scratched or whether a door panel is dented. Applying surface modeling techniques using computer vision to perform automated inspection of the scanned surfaces improves the efficiency and reduces costs in manufacturing, such as by detecting errors early in the manufacturing or assembly process.

Computer vision and machine vision techniques enable rapid and contactless surface modeling, in contrast to, for example, contact three-dimensional (3-D) scanners that probe a subject through physical touch. However, comparative computer vision techniques, whether performed passively (e.g., without additional illumination) or actively (e.g., with an active illumination device, which may emit structure light), may fail to reliably certain classes of surface characteristics that may be termed “optically challenging.” These may be circumstances where the color of the defect is very similar to the background color of the surface on which the defect appears. For example, defects such as scratches in a glass window or in the clear coat layers of a glossy paint and shallow dents in painted or unpainted metal surfaces may often be difficult to see in a standard color image of a surface, because the color (or texture) variation due to these defects may be relatively small. In other words, the contrast between the color of the defect and the color of the non-defective (or “clean”) surfaces may be relatively small, such as where a dent in a painted door panel has the same color as in the undented portion

Accordingly, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to detecting defects in objects based on polarization features of objects, as computed based on raw polarization frames captured of objects under inspection using one or more polarization cameras (e.g., cameras that include a polarizing filter in the optical path). Polarization-enhanced imaging can provide, in some embodiments, order of magnitude improvements to the characterization of the shapes of surface, including the accuracy of the detected direction of surface normals. Aesthetically smooth surfaces cannot have bumps or dents, which are essentially variations in local curvature which in turn are defined by their surface normal representations. Accordingly, some embodiments of the present disclosure can be applied to smoothness detection and shape fidelity in high precision manufacturing of industrial parts. One use case involves the inspection of manufactured parts before they leave the assembly line for delivery to the end customer. In many manufacturing systems, manufactured parts come off the assembly line on a conveyor system (e.g., on a conveyor belt) at high rates and, for efficiency of throughput, require that the inspection happen while the part is still moving, and with very little time between parts.

As such, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to systems and methods for surface characterization, including through the capture of polarization raw frames of the surfaces to be characterized, and computing characterizations, such as detecting defects in the surface, based on those polarization raw frames.

FIG. 1A is a schematic depiction of surfaces of an object (e.g., an automobile) under inspection by a surface characterization system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. In the arrangement shown in FIG. 1A, an object under inspection 1 may be within a scene or environment. For example, in the context of a factory or other manufacturing plant, the object under inspection 1 may be located on an assembly line and may be in motion on a conveyor system 40 such as a conveyor belt or an overhead conveyor (e.g., an overhead chain conveyor). The object under inspection 1 may have one or more surfaces (labeled in FIG. 1A as surface 2, surface 3, and surface 4), which are imaged by one or more polarization cameras 10. The polarization cameras 10 may be mounted on a mount, where the mount may be a movable mount, such as on an end-effector of a robotic arm 32 or may be a fixed mount, such as fixed on a gantry 34 above the conveyor system or as part of the conveyor system. The polarization cameras 10 capture polarization raw frames (images) 18 of various surfaces 2, 3, and 4 of the object under inspection 1, where each polarization camera 10 includes a polarizing filter in its optical path.

FIG. 1B is a schematic block diagram of a surface characterization system according to one embodiment of the present invention. In particular, FIG. 1B depicts one of the polarization cameras 10 configured to image surface 2 of the object under inspection 1. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1B, a polarization camera 10 has a lens 12 with a field of view, where the lens 12 and the camera 10 are oriented such that the field of view encompasses the surface under inspection (e.g., surface under inspection 2 of the object under inspection 1). The lens 12 is configured to direct light (e.g., focus light) from the scene (e.g., from the surface under inspection) onto a light sensitive medium such as an image sensor 14 (e.g., a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor or charge-coupled device (CCD) image sensor).

The polarization camera 10 further includes a polarizer or polarizing filter or polarization mask 16 placed in the optical path between the scene 1 and the image sensor 14. According to various embodiments of the present disclosure, the polarizer or polarization mask 16 is configured to enable the polarization camera 10 to capture images of the scene 1 with the polarizer set at various specified angles (e.g., at 45° rotations or at 60° rotations or at non-uniformly spaced rotations).

As one example, FIG. 1B depicts an embodiment where the polarization mask 16 is a polarization mosaic aligned with the pixel grid of the image sensor 14 in a manner similar to a red-green-blue (RGB) color filter (e.g., a Bayer filter) of a color camera. In a manner similar to how a color filter mosaic filters incoming light based on wavelength such that each pixel in the image sensor 14 receives light in a particular portion of the spectrum (e.g., red, green, or blue) in accordance with the pattern of color filters of the mosaic, a polarization mask 16 using a polarization mosaic filters light based on linear polarization such that different pixels receive light at different angles of linear polarization (e.g., at 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°, or at 0°, 60° degrees, and 120°). Accordingly, the polarization camera 10 using a polarization mask 16 such as that shown in FIG. 1 is capable of concurrently or simultaneously capturing light at four different linear polarizations. One example of a polarization camera is the Blackfly® S Polarization Camera produced by FLIR® Systems, Inc. of Wilsonville, Oreg.

While the above description relates to some possible implementations of a polarization camera using a polarization mosaic, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto and encompass other types of polarization cameras that are capable of capturing images at multiple different polarizations. For example, the polarization mask 16 may have fewer than four polarizations or more than four different polarizations, or may have polarizations at different angles than those stated above (e.g., at angles of polarization of: 0°, 60°, and 120° or at angles of polarization of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 150°). As another example, the polarization mask 16 may be implemented using an electronically controlled polarization mask, such as an electro-optic modulator (e.g., may include a liquid crystal layer), where the polarization angles of the individual pixels of the mask may be independently controlled, such that different portions of the image sensor 14 receive light having different polarizations. As another example, the electro-optic modulator may be configured to transmit light of different linear polarizations when capturing different frames, e.g., so that the camera captures images with the entirety of the polarization mask set to, sequentially, to different linear polarizer angles (e.g., sequentially set to: 0 degrees; 45 degrees; 90 degrees; or 135 degrees). As another example, the polarization mask 16 may include a polarizing filter that rotates mechanically, such that different polarization raw frames are captured by the polarization camera 10 with the polarizing filter mechanically rotated with respect to the lens 12 to transmit light at different angles of polarization to image sensor 14. Furthermore, while the above examples relate to the use of a linear polarizing filter, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto and also include the use of polarization cameras that include circular polarizing filters (e.g., linear polarizing filters with a quarter wave plate). Accordingly, in various embodiments of the present disclosure, a polarization camera uses a polarizing filter to capture multiple polarization raw frames at different polarizations of light, such as different linear polarization angles and different circular polarizations (e.g., handedness).

As a result, the polarization camera 10 captures multiple input images 18 (or polarization raw frames) of the scene including the surface under inspection 2 of the object under inspection 1. In some embodiments, each of the polarization raw frames 18 corresponds to an image taken behind a polarization filter or polarizer at a different angle of polarization ϕ_(pol) (e.g., 0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, or 135 degrees). Each of the polarization raw frames 18 is captured from substantially the same pose with respect to the scene 1 (e.g., the images captured with the polarization filter at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, or 135 degrees are all captured by a same polarization camera 100 located at a same location and orientation), as opposed to capturing the polarization raw frames from disparate locations and orientations with respect to the scene. The polarization camera 10 may be configured to detect light in a variety of different portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, such as the human-visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, red, green, and blue portions of the human-visible spectrum, as well as invisible portions of the electromagnetic spectrum such as infrared and ultraviolet.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, such as some of the embodiments described above, the different polarization raw frames are captured by a same polarization camera 10 and therefore may be captured from substantially the same pose (e.g., position and orientation) with respect to the scene 1. However, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto. For example, a polarization camera 10 may move with respect to the scene 1 between different polarization raw frames (e.g., when different raw polarization raw frames corresponding to different angles of polarization are captured at different times, such as in the case of a mechanically rotating polarizing filter), either because the polarization camera 10 has moved or because object 1 has moved (e.g., if the object is on a moving conveyor system). In some embodiments, different polarization cameras capture images of the object at different times, but from substantially the same pose with respect to the object (e.g., different cameras capturing images of the same surface of the object at different points in the conveyor system). Accordingly, in some embodiments of the present disclosure different polarization raw frames are captured with the polarization camera 10 at different poses or the same relative pose with respect to the object under inspection 1 and/or the surface under inspection 2.

The polarization raw frames 18 are supplied to a processing circuit 100, described in more detail below, which computes a characterization output 20 based on the polarization raw frames 18. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1B, the characterization output 20, includes a region 21 of the image of the surface 2 in which a defect is detected (e.g., a dent in a door of an automobile).

FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D provide background for illustrating the segmentation maps computed by a comparative approach and semantic segmentation or instance segmentation based on polarization raw frames according to embodiments of the present disclosure. In more detail, FIG. 2A is an image or intensity image of a scene with one real transparent ball placed on top of a printout of photograph depicting another scene containing two transparent balls (“spoofs”) and some background clutter. FIG. 2B depicts a segmentation mask as computed by a Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) identifying instances of transparent balls overlaid on the intensity image of FIG. 2A using different patterns of lines, where the real transparent ball is correctly identified as an instance, and the two spoofs are incorrectly identified as instances. In other words, the Mask R-CNN algorithm has been fooled into labeling the two spoof transparent balls as instances of actual transparent balls in the scene.

FIG. 2C is an angle of linear polarization (AOLP) image computed from polarization raw frames captured of the scene according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2C, transparent objects have a very unique texture in polarization space such as the AOLP domain, where there is a geometry-dependent signature on edges and a distinct or unique or particular pattern that arises on the surfaces of transparent objects in the angle of linear polarization. In other words, the intrinsic texture of the transparent object (e.g., as opposed to extrinsic texture adopted from the background surfaces visible through the transparent object) is more visible in the angle of polarization image of FIG. 2C than it is in the intensity image of FIG. 2A.

FIG. 2D depicts the intensity image of FIG. 2A with an overlaid segmentation mask as computed using polarization data in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, where the real transparent ball is correctly identified as an instance using an overlaid pattern of lines and the two spoofs are correctly excluded as instances (e.g., in contrast to FIG. 2B, FIG. 2D does not include overlaid patterns of lines over the two spoofs). While FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C, and 2D illustrate an example relating to detecting a real transparent object in the presence of spoof transparent objects, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto and may also be applied to other optically challenging objects, such as transparent, translucent, and non-matte or non-Lambertian objects, as well as non-reflective (e.g., matte black objects) and multipath inducing objects.

Accordingly, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to extracting, from the polarization raw frames, tensors in representation space (or first tensors in first representation spaces, such as polarization feature maps) to be supplied as input to surface characterization algorithms or other computer vision algorithms. These first tensors in first representation space may include polarization feature maps that encode information relating to the polarization of light received from the scene such as the AOLP image shown in FIG. 2C, degree of linear polarization (DOLP) feature maps, and the like (e.g., other combinations from Stokes vectors or transformations of individual ones of the polarization raw frames). In some embodiments, these polarization feature maps are used together with non-polarization feature maps (e.g., intensity images such as the image shown in FIG. 2A) to provide additional channels of information for use by semantic segmentation algorithms.

While embodiments of the present invention are not limited to use with particular surface characterization algorithms, some aspects of embodiments of the present invention relate to deep learning frameworks for polarization-based surface characterization of transparent objects (e.g., glass windows of vehicles and transparent glossy layers of paints) or other optically challenging objects (e.g., transparent, translucent, non-Lambertian, multipath inducing objects, and non-reflective (e.g., very dark) objects), where these frameworks may be referred to as Polarized Convolutional Neural Networks (Polarized CNNs). This Polarized CNN framework includes a backbone that is suitable for processing the particular texture of polarization and can be coupled with other computer vision architectures such as Mask R-CNN (e.g., to form a Polarized Mask R-CNN architecture) to produce a solution for accurate and robust characterization of transparent objects and other optically challenging objects. Furthermore, this approach may be applied to scenes with a mix of transparent and non-transparent (e.g., opaque objects) and can be used to characterize transparent, translucent, non-Lambertian, multipath inducing, dark, and opaque surfaces of the object or objects under inspection.

Polarization Feature Representation Spaces

Some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to systems and methods for extracting features from polarization raw frames in operation 650, where these extracted features are used in operation 690 in the robust detection of optically challenging characteristics in the surfaces of objects. In contrast, comparative techniques relying on intensity images alone may fail to detect these optically challenging features or surfaces (e.g., comparing the intensity image of FIG. 2A with the AOLP image of FIG. 2C, discussed above). The term “first tensors” in “first representation spaces” will be used herein to refer to features computed from (e.g., extracted from) polarization raw frames 18 captured by a polarization camera, where these first representation spaces include at least polarization feature spaces (e.g., feature spaces such as AOLP and DOLP that contain information about the polarization of the light detected by the image sensor) and may also include non-polarization feature spaces (e.g., feature spaces that do not require information regarding the polarization of light reaching the image sensor, such as images computed based solely on intensity images captured without any polarizing filters).

The interaction between light and transparent objects is rich and complex, but the material of an object determines its transparency under visible light. For many transparent household objects, the majority of visible light passes straight through and a small portion (˜4% to ˜8%, depending on the refractive index) is reflected. This is because light in the visible portion of the spectrum has insufficient energy to excite atoms in the transparent object. As a result, the texture (e.g., appearance) of objects behind the transparent object (or visible through the transparent object) dominate the appearance of the transparent object. For example, when looking at a transparent glass cup or tumbler on a table, the appearance of the objects on the other side of the tumbler (e.g., the surface of the table) generally dominate what is seen through the cup. This property leads to some difficulties when attempting to detect surface characteristics of transparent objects such as glass windows and glossy, transparent layers of paint, based on intensity images alone:

FIG. 3 is a high-level depiction of the interaction of light with transparent objects and non-transparent (e.g., diffuse and/or reflective) objects. As shown in FIG. 3, a polarization camera 10 captures polarization raw frames of a scene that includes a transparent object 302 in front of an opaque background object 303. A light ray 310 hitting the image sensor 14 of the polarization camera 10 contains polarization information from both the transparent object 302 and the background object 303. The small fraction of reflected light 312 from the transparent object 302 is heavily polarized, and thus has a large impact on the polarization measurement, in contrast to the light 313 reflected off the background object 303 and passing through the transparent object 302.

Similarly, a light ray hitting the surface of an object may interact with the shape of the surface in various ways. For example, a surface with a glossy paint may behave substantially similarly to a transparent object in front of an opaque object as shown in FIG. 3, where interactions between the light ray and a transparent or translucent layer (or clear coat layer) of the glossy paint causes the light reflecting off of the surface to be polarized based on the characteristics of the transparent or translucent layer (e.g., based on the thickness and surface normals of the layer), which are encoded in the light ray hitting the image sensor. Similarly, as discussed in more detail below with respect to shape from polarization (SfP) theory, variations in the shape of the surface (e.g., direction of the surface normals) may cause significant changes in the polarization of light reflected by the surface of the object. For example, smooth surfaces may generally exhibit the same polarization characteristics throughout, but a scratch or a dent in the surface changes the direction of the surface normals in those areas, and light hitting scratches or dents may be polarized, attenuated, or reflected in ways different than in other portions of the surface of the object. Models of the interactions between light and matter generally consider three fundamentals: geometry, lighting, and material. Geometry is based on the shape of the material. Lighting includes the direction and color of the lighting. Material can be parameterized by the refractive index or angular reflection/transmission of light. This angular reflection is known as a bi-directional reflectance distribution function (BRDF), although other functional forms may more accurately represent certain scenarios. For example, the bidirectional subsurface scattering distribution function (BSSRDF) would be more accurate in the context of materials that exhibit subsurface scattering (e.g. marble or wax).

A light ray 310 hitting the image sensor 16 of a polarization camera 10 has three measurable components: the intensity of light (intensity image/I), the percentage or proportion of light that is linearly polarized (degree of linear polarization/DOLP/ρ), and the direction of that linear polarization (angle of linear polarization/AOLP/ϕ). These properties encode information about the surface curvature and material of the object being imaged, which can be used by the predictor 800 to detect transparent objects, as described in more detail below. In some embodiments, the predictor 800 can detect other optically challenging objects based on similar polarization properties of light passing through translucent objects and/or light interacting with multipath inducing objects or by non-reflective objects (e.g., matte black objects).

Therefore, some aspects of embodiments of the present invention relate to using a feature extractor 700 to compute first tensors in one or more first representation spaces, which may include derived feature maps based on the intensity I, the DOLP ρ, and the AOLP ϕ. The feature extractor 700 may generally extract information into first representation spaces (or first feature spaces) which include polarization representation spaces (or polarization feature spaces) such as “polarization images,” in other words, images that are extracted based on the polarization raw frames that would not otherwise be computable from intensity images (e.g., images captured by a camera that did not include a polarizing filter or other mechanism for detecting the polarization of light reaching its image sensor), where these polarization images may include DOLP ρ images (in DOLP representation space or feature space), AOLP ϕ images (in AOLP representation space or feature space), other combinations of the polarization raw frames as computed from Stokes vectors, as well as other images (or more generally first tensors or first feature tensors) of information computed from polarization raw frames. The first representation spaces may include non-polarization representation spaces such as the intensity I representation space.

Measuring intensity I, DOLP ρ, and AOLP ϕ at each pixel requires 3 or more polarization raw frames of a scene taken behind polarizing filters (or polarizers) at different angles, ϕ_(pol) (e.g., because there are three unknown values to be determined: intensity I, DOLP ρ, and AOLP ϕ. For example, the FLIR® Blackfly® S Polarization Camera described above captures polarization raw frames with polarization angles ϕ_(pol) at 0 degrees, 45 degrees, 90 degrees, or 135 degrees, thereby producing four polarization raw frames I_(ϕ) _(pol) , denoted herein as I₀, I₄₅, I₉₀, and I₁₃₅.

The relationship between I_(ϕ) _(pol) and intensity I, DOLP ρ, and AOLP ϕ at each pixel can be expressed as:

I _(ϕ) _(pol) =I(1+ρ cos(2((ϕ−ϕ_(pol))  (1)

Accordingly, with four different polarization raw frames I_(pol) (I₀, I₄₅, I₉₀, and I₁₃₅), a system of four equations can be used to solve for the intensity I, DOLP ρ, and AOLP ϕ.

Shape from Polarization (SfP) theory (see, e.g., Gary A Atkinson and Edwin R Hancock. Recovery of surface orientation from diffuse polarization. IEEE transactions on image processing, 15(6):1653-1664, 2006.) states that the relationship between the refractive index (n), azimuth angle (θ_(a)) and zenith angle (θ_(z)) of the surface normal of an object and the ϕ and ρ components of the light ray coming from that object follow the following characteristics when diffuse reflection is dominant:

$\begin{matrix} {\rho = \frac{\left( {n - \frac{1}{n}} \right)^{2}{\sin^{2}\left( \theta_{z} \right)}}{2 + {2n^{2}} - {\left( {n + \frac{1}{n}} \right)^{2}\sin^{2}\theta_{z}} + {4\;\cos\;\theta_{z}\sqrt{n^{2} - {\sin^{2}\theta_{z}}}}}} & (2) \\ {\phi = \theta_{a}} & (3) \end{matrix}$

and when the specular reflection is dominant:

$\begin{matrix} {\rho = \frac{2\;\sin^{2}\theta_{z}\cos\;\theta_{z}\sqrt{n^{2} - {\sin^{2}\theta_{z}}}}{n^{2} - {\sin^{2}\theta_{z}} - {n^{2}\sin^{2}\theta_{z}} + {2\;\sin^{4}\theta_{z}}}} & (4) \\ {\phi = {\theta_{a} - \frac{\pi}{2}}} & (5) \end{matrix}$

Note that in both cases ρ increases exponentially as Oz increases and if the refractive index is the same, specular reflection is much more polarized than diffuse reflection.

Accordingly, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to applying SfP theory to detect the shapes of surfaces (e.g., the orientation of surfaces) based on the raw polarization frames 18 of the surfaces. This approach enables the shapes of objects to be characterized without the use of other computer vision techniques for determining the shapes of objects, such as time-of-flight (ToF) depth sensing and/or stereo vision techniques, although embodiments of the present disclosure may be used in conjunction with such techniques.

More formally, aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to computing first tensors 50 in first representation spaces, including extracting first tensors in polarization representation spaces such as forming polarization images (or extracting derived polarization feature maps) in operation 650 based on polarization raw frames captured by a polarization camera 10.

Light rays coming from a transparent objects have two components: a reflected portion including reflected intensity I_(r), reflected DOLP ρ_(r), and reflected AOLP ϕ_(r) and the refracted portion including refracted intensity I_(t), refracted DOLP ρ_(t), and refracted AOLP ϕ_(t). The intensity of a single pixel in the resulting image can be written as:

I=I _(r) +I _(t)  (6)

When a polarizing filter having a linear polarization angle of ϕ_(pol) is placed in front of the camera, the value at a given pixel is:

I _(ϕ) _(pol) =I _(r)(1+ρ_(r) cos(2(ϕ_(r)−ϕ_(pol)))+I _(t)(1+ρ_(t) cos(2(ϕ_(t)−ϕ_(pol))  (7)

Solving the above expression for the values of a pixel in a DOLP ρ image and a pixel in an AOLP ϕ image in terms of I_(r), ρ_(r), ϕ_(r), I_(t), ρ_(t), and ϕ_(t):

$\begin{matrix} {\rho = \frac{\sqrt{\left( {I_{r}\rho_{r}} \right)^{2} + \left( {I_{t}\rho_{t}} \right)^{2} + {2I_{t}\rho_{t}I_{r}\rho_{r}{\cos\left( {2\left( {\phi_{r} - \phi_{t}} \right)} \right)}}}}{I_{r} + I_{t}}} & (8) \\ {\phi = {{\arctan\left( \frac{I_{r}\rho_{r}{\sin\left( {2\left( {\phi_{r} - \phi_{t}} \right)} \right)}}{{I_{r}\rho_{t}} + {I_{r}\rho_{r}{\cos\left( {2\left( {\phi_{r} - \phi_{t}} \right)} \right)}}} \right)} + \phi_{r}}} & (9) \end{matrix}$

Accordingly, equations (7), (8), and (9), above, provide a model for forming first tensors 50 in first representation spaces that include an intensity image I, a DOLP image ρ, and an AOLP image ϕ according to one embodiment of the present disclosure, where the use of polarization images or tensor in polarization representation spaces (including DOLP image ρ and an AOLP image ϕ based on equations (8) and (9)) enables the reliable detection of optically challenging surface characteristics of objects that are generally not detectable by comparative systems that use only intensity I images as input.

In more detail, first tensors in polarization representation spaces (among the derived feature maps 50) such as the polarization images DOLP ρ and AOLP ϕ can reveal surface characteristics of objects that might otherwise appear textureless in an intensity I domain. A transparent object may have a texture that is invisible in the intensity domain I because this intensity is strictly dependent on the ratio of I_(r)/I_(t)(see equation (6)). Unlike opaque objects where I_(t)=0, transparent objects transmit most of the incident light and only reflect a small portion of this incident light. As another example, thin or small deviations in the shape of an otherwise smooth surface (or smooth portions in an otherwise rough surface) may be substantially invisible or have low contrast in the intensity I domain (e.g., a domain in which polarization of light is not taken into account), but may be very visible or may have high contrast in a polarization representation space such as DOLP ρ or AOLP ϕ.

As such, one exemplary method to acquire surface topography is to use polarization cues in conjunction with geometric regularization. The Fresnel equations relate the AOLP ϕ and the DOLP ρ with surface normals. These equations can be useful for anomaly detection by exploiting what is known as polarization patterns of the surface. A polarization pattern is a tensor of size [M, N, K] where M and N are horizontal and vertical pixel dimensions, respectively, and where K is the polarization data channel, which can vary in size. For example, if circular polarization is ignored and only linear polarization is considered, then K would be equal to two, because linear polarization has both an angle and a degree of polarization (AOLP ϕ and DOLP ρ). Analogous to a Moire pattern, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the feature extraction module 700 extracts a polarization pattern in polarization representation spaces (e.g., AOLP space and DOLP space). In the example characterization output 20 shown in FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B shown above, the horizontal and vertical dimensions correspond to the lateral field of view of a narrow strip or patch of the surface 2 captured by the polarization camera 10. However, this is one exemplary case: in various embodiments, the strip or patch of the surface may be vertical (e.g., much taller than wide), horizontal (e.g., much wider than tall), or have a more conventional field of view (FoV) that tends closer toward a square (e.g., a 4:3 ratio or 16:9 ratio of width to height).

While the preceding discussion provides specific examples of polarization representation spaces based on linear polarization in the case of using a polarization camera having one or more linear polarizing filters to capture polarization raw frames corresponding to different angles of linear polarization and to compute tensors in linear polarization representation spaces such as DOLP and AOLP, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto. For example, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, a polarization camera includes one or more circular polarizing filters configured to pass only circularly polarized light, and where polarization patterns or first tensors in circular polarization representation space are further extracted from the polarization raw frames. In some embodiments, these additional tensors in circular polarization representation space are used alone, and in other embodiments they are used together with the tensors in linear polarization representation spaces such as AOLP and DOLP. For example, a polarization pattern including tensors in polarization representation spaces may include tensors in circular polarization space, AOLP, and DOLP, where the polarization pattern may have dimensions [M,N,K], where K is three to further include the tensor in circular polarization representation space.

FIG. 4 is a graph of the energy of light that is transmitted versus reflected over a range of incident angles to a surface having a refractive index of approximately 1.5. As shown in FIG. 4, the slopes of the transmitted energy (shown in FIG. 4 with a solid line) and reflected energy (shown in FIG. 4 with a dotted line) lines are relatively small at low incident angles (e.g., at angles closer to perpendicular to the plane of the surface). As such, small differences in the angle of the surface may be difficult to detect (low contrast) in the polarization pattern when the angle of incidence is low (e.g., close to perpendicular to the surface, in other words, close to the surface normal). On the other hand, the slope of the reflected energy increases from flat, as the angle of incidence increases, and the slope of the transmitted energy decreases from flat (to have a larger absolute value) as the angle of incidence increases. In the example shown in FIG. 4 with an index of refraction of 1.5, the slopes of both lines are substantially steeper beginning at an incident angle of around 60°, and their slopes are very steep at an incident angle of around 80°. The particular shapes of the curves may change for different materials in accordance with the refractive index of the material. Therefore, capturing images of surfaces under inspection at incident angles corresponding to steeper portions of the curves (e.g., angles close to parallel to the surface, such as around 80° in the case of a refractive index of 1.5, as shown in FIG. 4) can improve the contrast and detectability of variations in the surface shapes in the polarization raw frames 18 and may improve the detectability of such features in tensors in polarization representation spaces, because small changes in incident angle (due to the small changes in the surface normal) can cause large changes in the captured polarization raw frames.

Accordingly, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to supplying first tensors in the first representation spaces (e.g., including feature maps in polarization representation spaces) extracted from polarization raw frames as inputs to a predictor for computing or detecting surface characteristics of transparent objects and/or other optically challenging surface characteristics of objects under inspection. These first tensors may include derived feature maps which may include an intensity feature map I, a degree of linear polarization (DOLP) ρ feature map, and an angle of linear polarization (AOLP) ϕ feature map, and where the DOLP ρ feature map and the AOLP ϕ feature map are examples of polarization feature maps or tensors in polarization representation spaces, in reference to feature maps that encode information regarding the polarization of light detected by a polarization camera. In some embodiments, the feature maps or tensors in polarization representation spaces are supplied as input to, for example, detection algorithms that make use of SfP theory to characterize the shape of surfaces of objects imaged by the polarization cameras 10.

Surface Characterization Based on Polarization Features

As shown above in FIGS. 1A and 1B, aspects of embodiments of the present invention relate to systems and methods for performing surface characterization of objects under inspection by capturing images of surfaces of objects 1 using one or more polarization cameras 10 that capture polarization raw frames 18 that are analyzed by a processing system or processing circuit 100. The characterization of the surfaces may include detecting surface characteristics that are optically challenging, e.g., surface characteristics that may be difficult or impossible to detect using comparative computer vision or machine vision techniques that do not use polarization information. While some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to surface characteristics that correspond to defects in manufactured products (e.g., defects such as cracks, tears, uneven application of paints or dyes, the presence of surface contaminants, unintentional surface irregularities or other geometric deviations from reference models, and the like), embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto and may be applied to detecting other surface characteristics such as detecting the locations boundaries between different types of materials, measuring the uniformity of the refractive index of a material across an area, characterizing geometry of surface treatments applied to portions of materials (e.g., the etching of materials and/or the depositing of materials onto surfaces), and the like.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of processing circuit 100 for computing surface characterization outputs based on polarization data according to one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a method 600 for performing surface characterization based on input images to compute a surface characterization output according to one embodiment of the present invention.

According to various embodiments of the present disclosure, the processing circuit 100 is implemented using one or more electronic circuits configured to perform various operations as described in more detail below. Types of electronic circuits may include a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU), an artificial intelligence (AI) accelerator (e.g., a vector processor, which may include vector arithmetic logic units configured efficiently perform operations common to neural networks, such dot products and softmax), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a digital signal processor (DSP), or the like. For example, in some circumstances, aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure are implemented in program instructions that are stored in a non-volatile computer readable memory where, when executed by the electronic circuit (e.g., a CPU, a GPU, an AI accelerator, or combinations thereof), perform the operations described herein to compute a characterization output 20 from input polarization raw frames 18. The operations performed by the processing circuit 100 may be performed by a single electronic circuit (e.g., a single CPU, a single GPU, or the like) or may be allocated between multiple electronic circuits (e.g., multiple GPUs or a CPU in conjunction with a GPU). The multiple electronic circuits may be local to one another (e.g., located on a same die, located within a same package, or located within a same embedded device or computer system) and/or may be remote from one other (e.g., in communication over a network such as a local personal area network such as Bluetooth®, over a local area network such as a local wired and/or wireless network, and/or over wide area network such as the internet, such a case where some operations are performed locally and other operations are performed on a server hosted by a cloud computing service). One or more electronic circuits operating to implement the processing circuit 100 may be referred to herein as a computer or a computer system, which may include memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more electronic circuits, implement the systems and methods described herein.

As shown in FIG. 5, in some embodiments, a processing circuit 100 includes a feature extractor or feature extraction system 700 and a predictor 800 (e.g., a classical computer vision prediction algorithm and/or a trained statistical model such as a trained neural network) configured to compute a prediction output 20 (e.g., a statistical prediction) regarding surface characteristics of objects based on the output of the feature extraction system 700. While some embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein in the context of a surface characterization system for detecting defects in the surfaces of manufactured objects, where those surface defects may be optically challenging to detect, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto. For example, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure may be applied to techniques for characterizing the surfaces of objects made of materials or have surface characteristics that are optically challenging to detect, such as surfaces of translucent objects, multipath inducing objects, objects that are not entirely or substantially matte or Lambertian, and/or very dark objects. These optically challenging objects include objects and surface characteristics thereof that are difficult to resolve or detect through the use of images that are capture by camera systems that are not sensitive to the polarization of light (e.g., based on images captured by cameras without a polarizing filter in the optical path or where different images do not capture images based on different polarization angles). For example, these surface characteristics may have surface appearances or colors that are very similar to the surfaces on which the characteristics appear (e.g., dents have the same color as the underlying material and scratches on transparent materials such as glass may also be substantially transparent). In addition, while embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein in the context of detecting optically challenging surface characteristics, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited to detecting only optically challenging surface defects. For example, in some embodiments, a predictor 800 is configured (e.g., a statistical model is trained using training data) to detect both surface characteristics that are optically challenging as well as surface characteristics that are robustly detectable without using polarization information.

Polarization may be used to detect surface characteristics or features that would otherwise be optically challenging when using intensity information (e.g., color intensity information) alone. For example, polarization information can detect changes in geometry and changes in material in the surfaces of objects. The changes in material (or material changes), such as boundaries between different types of materials (e.g., a black metallic object on a black road or a colorless liquid on a surface may both be substantially invisible in color space, but would both have corresponding polarization signatures in polarization space), may be more visible in polarization space because differences in the refractive indexes of the different materials cause changes in the polarization of the light. Likewise, differences in the specularity of various materials cause different changes in the polarization phase angle of rotation, also leading to detectable features in polarization space that might otherwise be optically challenging to detect without using a polarizing filter. Accordingly, this causes contrast to appear in images or tensors in polarization representation spaces, where corresponding regions of tensors computed in intensity space (e.g., color representation spaces that do not account for the polarization of light) may fail to capture these surface characteristics (e.g., where these surface characteristics have low contrast or may be invisible in these spaces). Examples of optically challenging surface characteristics include: the particular shapes of the surfaces (e.g., degree of smoothness and deviations from ideal or acceptable physical design tolerances for the surfaces); surface roughness and shapes of the surface roughness patterns (e.g., intentional etchings, scratches, and edges in the surfaces of transparent objects and machined parts), burrs and flash at the edges of machined parts and molded parts; and the like. Polarization would also be useful to detect objects with identical colors, but differing material properties, such as scattering or refractive index.

As shown in FIG. 6 and referring, for example, to FIG. 1B, in operation 610 the processing circuit 100 captures polarization raw frames 18 of a surface 2 of an object under inspection 1. For example, in some embodiments, the processing circuit 100 controls one or more polarization cameras 10 to capture polarization raw frames 18 depicting a particular surface 2 of the object. In various embodiments of the present disclosure, the capture of particular surfaces of the object under inspection may be triggered using one or more detection systems, such as a mechanical switch trigger (e.g. when a portion of the object or a conveyor system closes an electronic switch to signal the current location of the object), a laser trigger (e.g., when a portion of the object 1 blocks a laser beam from reaching a detector), or an optical trigger (e.g., a camera system detects the presence of the object at a particular location).

Referring back to FIG. 1A, a polarization-enhanced imaging system or surface characterization system according to embodiments of the present disclosure may use polarization cameras 10 mounted either on a gantry located around the conveyor belt or on the end-effector of robotic arms, which can be used to provide patch-based images of the object 1 (e.g., images or patches or strips of surfaces of the object 1) as the object 1 moves on the conveyor belt. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, polarization cameras 10 attached to the movable mounts are automatically repositioned by the system to place the polarization cameras 10 in poses such that the incident angle of the light on the surface is in the steeper or higher contrast portion of the curves shown in FIG. 4 (e.g., based on the general orientations of the surface under inspection and the light sources in the scene). In some embodiments of the present disclosure, illumination sources (e.g., running lights or flashes) may also be placed in fixed locations or attached to the movable mounts (e.g., either rigidly attached to a corresponding polarization camera or attached to an independently movable moveable mount) to illuminate the surfaces of the object with light at an incident angle that makes the surface shape features of the object more easily detectable (e.g., at high incident angles).

Accordingly, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, capturing the polarization raw frames 18 of a surface 2 of the object under inspection 1 in operation 610 includes moving polarization cameras 10 and/or illumination sources to poses with respect to the surface 2 under inspection in accordance with particular characteristics of the surface 2 to be characterized. For example, in some embodiments, this involves automatically positioning the polarization cameras 10 and/or illumination sources such that light from the illumination sources strikes the surface 2 at a high incident angle (e.g., around 80 degrees). In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the particular positions at which high incident angles may be feasible will vary based on the particular shapes of the surfaces to be inspected (e.g., the design of a door of a car may include different portions with significantly different surface normals, such as an indentation at the door handle, edges where the door meets the window, and indentations in the main surface of the door for style and/or aerodynamics).

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the processing circuit 100 loads a profile associated with the type or class of object under inspection, where the profile includes a collection of one or more poses for the polarization camera 10 to be moved to in relation to the object under inspection 1. Different types or classes of objects having different shapes may be associated with different profiles, while manufactured objects of the same type or class are expected to have the same shape. (For example, different models of vehicles may have different shapes, and these different models of vehicles may be mixed in an assembly line. Accordingly, the processing circuit 100 may select, from a collection of different profiles, a profile corresponding to the type of vehicle currently under inspection.) Accordingly, the polarization camera 10 may be automatically moved through a sequence of poses stored in the profile to capture polarization raw frames 18 of the surfaces of the object under inspection 1.

In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, in operation 650, the feature extraction system 700 of the processing circuit 100 extracts one or more first feature maps 50 in one or more first representation spaces (including polarization images or polarization feature maps in various polarization representation spaces) from the input polarization raw frames 18 of a scene.

FIG. 7A is a block diagram of a feature extractor 700 according to one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 7B is a flowchart depicting a method according to one embodiment of the present invention for extracting features from polarization raw frames. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 7A, the feature extractor 700 includes an intensity extractor 720 configured to extract an intensity image I 52 in an intensity representation space (e.g., in accordance with equation (7), as one example of a non-polarization representation space) and polarization feature extractors 730 configured to extract features in one or more polarization representation spaces. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the intensity extractor 720 is omitted and the feature extractor does not extract an intensity image I 52.

As shown in FIG. 7B, the extraction of polarization images in operation 650 may include extracting, in operation 651, a first tensor in a first polarization representation space from the polarization raw frames from a first Stokes vector. In operation 652, the feature extractor 700 further extracts a second tensor in a second polarization representation space from the polarization raw frames. For example, the polarization feature extractors 730 may include a DOLP extractor 740 configured to extract a DOLP ρ image 54 (e.g., a first polarization image or a first tensor in accordance with equation (8) with DOLP as the first polarization representation space) and an AOLP extractor 760 configured to extract an AOLP ϕ image 56 (e.g., a second polarization image or a second tensor in accordance with equation (9), with AOLP as the second polarization representation space) from the supplied polarization raw frames 18. In addition, in various embodiments, the feature extraction system 700 extracts two or more different tensors (e.g., n different tensors) in two or more representation spaces (e.g., n representation spaces), where the n-th tensor is extracted in operation 614. As discussed above, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the polarization feature extractors 730 extracts polarization features in polarization representation spaces including both linear polarization representation spaces (e.g., tensors in the aforementioned AOLP and DOLP representation spaces extracted from polarization raw frames captured with a linear polarizing filter) and circular polarization representation spaces (e.g., tensors extracted from polarization raw frames captured with a circular polarizing filter). In various embodiments, the representation spaces include, but are not limited to, polarization representation spaces.

The polarization representation spaces may include combinations of polarization raw frames in accordance with Stokes vectors. As further examples, the polarization representations may include modifications or transformations of polarization raw frames in accordance with one or more image processing filters (e.g., a filter to increase image contrast or a denoising filter). The feature maps 52, 54, and 56 in first polarization representation spaces may then be supplied to a predictor 800 for detecting surface characteristics based on the feature maps 50.

While FIG. 7B illustrates a case where two or more different tensors are extracted from the polarization raw frames 18 in more than two different representation spaces, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto. For example, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, exactly one tensor in a polarization representation space is extracted from the polarization raw frames 18. For example, one polarization representation space of raw frames is AOLP ϕ and another is DOLP ρ (e.g., in some applications, AOLP may be sufficient for detecting surface characteristics of transparent objects or surface characteristics of other optically challenging objects such as translucent, non-Lambertian, multipath inducing, and/or non-reflective objects).

Accordingly, extracting features such as polarization feature maps or polarization images from polarization raw frames 18 produces first tensors 50 from which optically challenging surface characteristics may be detected from images of surfaces of objects under inspection. In some embodiments, the first tensors extracted by the feature extractor 700 may be explicitly derived features (e.g., hand crafted by a human designer) that relate to underlying physical phenomena that may be exhibited in the polarization raw frames (e.g., the calculation of AOLP and DOLP images in linear polarization spaces and the calculation of tensors in circular polarization spaces, as discussed above). In some additional embodiments of the present disclosure, the feature extractor 700 extracts other non-polarization feature maps or non-polarization images, such as intensity maps for different colors of light (e.g., red, green, and blue light) and transformations of the intensity maps (e.g., applying image processing filters to the intensity maps). In some embodiments of the present disclosure the feature extractor 700 may be configured to extract one or more features that are automatically learned (e.g., features that are not manually specified by a human) through an end-to-end supervised training process based on labeled training data. In some embodiments, these learned feature extractors may include deep convolutional neural networks, which may be used in conjunction with traditional computer vision filters (e.g., a Haar wavelet transform, a Canny edge detector, and the like).

Surface Characterization Based on Tensors in Representation Spaces Including Polarization Representation Spaces

The feature maps in first representation space 50 (including polarization images) extracted by the feature extraction system 700 are provided as input to the predictor 800 of the processing circuit 100, which implements one or more prediction models to compute, in operation 690, a surface characterization output 20.

In the case where the predictor 800 is a defect detection system, the prediction may be an image 20 (e.g., an intensity image) of the surface 2, where a portion of the image is marked 21 or highlighted as containing a defect. In some embodiments, the output of the defect detection system is a segmentation map, where each pixel may be associated with one or more confidences that the pixel corresponds to a location of various possible classes (or types) of surface characteristics (e.g., defects) that may be found in objects that the surface characterization system is trained to inspect, or a confidence that the pixel corresponds to an anomalous condition in the image of the surface of the object under inspection. In the case where the predictor is a classification system, the prediction may include a plurality of classes and corresponding confidences that the image depicts an instance of each of the classes (e.g. that the image depicts various types of defects or different types of surface characteristics such as smooth glass, etched glass, scratched glass, and the like). In the case where the predictor 800 is a classical computer vision prediction algorithm, the predictor may compute a detection result (e.g., detect defects by comparing the extracted feature maps in first representation space to model feature maps in the first representation space or identify edges or regions with sharp or discontinuous changes in the feature map in areas that are expected to be smooth).

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5, the predictor 800 implements a defect detection system and computes, in operation 690, a surface characterization output 20 that includes a location of a detected defect, which is computed based on the extracted first tensors 50 in first representation spaces, extracted from the input polarization raw frames 18. As noted above, the feature extraction system 700 and the predictor 800 are implemented using one or more electronic circuits that are configured to perform their operations, as described in more detail below.

According to various embodiments of the present disclosure, the surface 2 of the object 1 as imaged by the one or more polarization cameras 10 is characterized in accordance with a model associated with the surface. The particular details of the surface characterization performed by a surface characterization system according to embodiments of the present invention depend on the particular application and the surfaces being characterized.

Continuing the above example of the detection of defects on the surfaces of an automobile, different types of defects may appear on different surfaces of the automobile, due to the locations and methods of manufacturing the various parts and due to the types of materials used in the different parts. For example, painted metal door panels may exhibit different types of defects (e.g., scratches, dents) than glass windows (e.g., scratches, chips, and cracks), which may exhibit defects that are different from those found in plastic components (e.g., headlight covers, which may also show scratches, chips, and cracks, but may also contain expected and intentional surface irregularities, including such as surface ridges and bumps and ejector pin marks).

As another example, in a machined, metal part, some surfaces may be expected to be smooth and glossy, while other surfaces may be expected to be rough or to have particular physical patterns (e.g., patterns of grooves, bumps, or random textures), where different surfaces of the machined part may have different tolerances.

FIG. 8A is a block diagram of a predictor according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 8A, a predictor 800 receives input tensors in first representation spaces 50. The predictor 800 may include a collection of models 810 associated with different types of surfaces that are expected to be analyzed by the surface characterization system. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 8A, the predictor 800 has access to m different models (e.g., different models stored in the memory of the processing circuit 100). For example, a first model 811 may be associated with main surfaces of door panels, a second model 812, may be associated with the handle portion of a door panel, and an m-th model 814 may be associated with a tail light.

FIG. 8B is a flowchart depicting a method 690 according to one embodiment of the present invention for detecting characteristics of surfaces of objects. In operation 691, the processing system 100 selects a model, from among the collection of models 810, that corresponds to the current surface. In some embodiments, the particular model is selected based on metadata stored in the profile associated with the object under inspection 1 and associated with the particular pose at which the polarization raw frames 18 were captured by the polarization camera 10.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure the orientation of the objects under inspection is consistent from one object to the next. For example, in the case of automobile manufacturing, each assembled automobile may move along the conveyor system with its nose leading (e.g. as opposed to some moving with the drivers' side leading and some with the rear of the vehicle leading). Accordingly, images of different surfaces of the object under inspection 1 may be reliably captured based on known information about the position of the automobile on the conveyor system and its speed. For example, a camera located at a particular height on the drivers' side of the automobile may expect to image a particular portion of the bumper, the fender, the wheel wells, the drivers' side door, the quarter panel, and the rear bumper of the car. Based on the speed of the conveyor system and a triggering time at which the automobile enters the field of view of the surface characterization system, various surfaces of the automobile will be expected to be imaged at different times, in accordance with a profile associated with the type of the object (e.g., the type, class, or model of the car).

In some embodiments, the orientations of the objects under inspection may be inconsistent, and therefore a separate registration process may be employed to determine which surfaces are being imaged by the polarization cameras 10. In these embodiments, the profile may include a three-dimensional (3-D) model of the object under inspection (e.g., a computer aided design or CAD model of the physical object or three-dimensional mesh or point cloud model). Accordingly, in some embodiments, a simultaneous location and mapping (SLAM) algorithm is applied to determine which portions of object under inspection are being imaged by the polarization cameras 10 and to use the determined locations to identify corresponding locations on the 3-D model, thereby enabling a determination of which surfaces of the 3-D model were imaged by the polarization cameras 10. For example, keypoint detection algorithms may be used to detect unique parts of the object, and the keypoints are used to match the orientation of the 3-D model to the orientation of the physical object under inspection 1.

As such, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, a surface registration module 820 of the prediction system 800 registers the polarization raw frames 18 captured by the polarization cameras (and/or the tensors in representation spaces 50) with particular portions of the object under inspection based on a profile associated with the object to select a model associated with the current surface imaged by the polarization raw frames 18 from a collection of models 810.

In operation 693, the processing system applies the selected model using the surface analyzer 830 to compute the surface characterization output 20 for the current surface. Details of the various types of models and the particular operations performed by the surface analyzer 830 based on these different types of models according to various embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below.

Surface Characterization Through Comparison with Design Models and Representative Models

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the stored models include feature maps in representation space as computed from representative models (e.g., design models) of the objects under inspection, and the surface analyzer compares the feature maps computed from the captured polarization raw frames 18 against the stored representative (e.g., ideal) feature maps in the same representation space.

For example, as noted above, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, the representation spaces include a degree of linear polarization (DOLP) ρ and an angle of linear polarization (AOLP) ϕ. In some such embodiments, the models 810 include reference 2-D and/or 3-D models (e.g., CAD models) of the surfaces, which have their intrinsic surface normals. These intrinsic surface reference models are sometimes referred to as design surface normals and are the design targets of the surface (e.g., ideal shapes of the surface), and therefore these represent the ground truth for the patch under inspection (e.g., the patch of the surface imaged by the set of polarization raw frames 18).

In such embodiments, the feature extraction system 700 extracts surface normals using shape from polarization (SfP), and these surface normal are aligned, by the surface registration module 820, with the reference 2-D and/or 3-D models (e.g., the CAD models) of the corresponding part of surface.

In this embodiment, the surface analyzer 830 performs a comparison between the surface normals represented in the tensors in representation space 50 computed from the polarization raw frames 18 and the design surface normals from a corresponding one of the models 810 to find the regions of discrepancy whereby the different areas are identified and flagged. For example, portions of the tensors in representation spaces 50 computed from the raw polarization frames 18 that differ from the corresponding portions of the design surface normals (in the same representation spaces as the tensors 50) by more than a threshold amount are marked as discrepancies or potential defects, while other portions that differ by less than the threshold are marked as clean (e.g., not defective). In various embodiments of the present disclosure, this threshold may be set based on, for example, designed tolerances for the surface under inspection and the sensitivity of the system (e.g., in accordance with noise levels in the system, such as sensor noise in the image sensor 14 of the polarization camera 10.

In addition, given that the regions of interest have both the computed surface normals and the 3-D coordinates of the surface from the design target loaded from the selected model from the models 810, in some embodiments the surface analyzer 830 converts the regions into 3-D point clouds representing the shape of the imaged surface (e.g., using shape from polarization equations), and the surface analyzer 830 performs further inspection and analysis on the generated 3-D point clouds, such as by comparing the shapes of the 3-D point clouds to the shapes of the corresponding surfaces in the reference 3-D models. The comparison may include iteratively reorienting the point clouds to minimize the distance between the points in the point cloud and the surface of the reference 3-D models, where points of the point cloud that are more than a threshold distance away from the surface of the reference 3-D model regions of the surface under inspection that deviate from the reference model and that may correspond to geometric defects (e.g., dents, burrs, or other surface irregularities).

As another example, manufactured parts that meet the same tolerance will have substantially the same polarization patterns under similar lighting (e.g., the same polarization patterns, with variations due to the manufacturing tolerances). The polarization pattern of an ideal or expected or reference part will be referred to as a template polarization pattern or a reference tensor (which would correspond to the model selected from the set of models 810). In these embodiments, the feature extraction system 700 extracts a measured polarization pattern for a surface of an object under inspection (e.g., measured tensors in first representation spaces the AOLP and DOLP feature maps described above). If the surface of the object contained an anomaly, such as a micro-dent in the surface, this anomaly would appear in the measured polarization pattern, thereby resulting in its classification as an anomalous polarization pattern (or having a region containing an anomaly, such as region 21 shown in FIG. 1B) that differs from the template polarization pattern or reference tensors in the first representation spaces. On the other hand, a defect-free surface would generate a measured polarization pattern that matched (within tolerances) the template polarization pattern or reference tensors (e.g., when the measured polarization pattern matches, then it is classified as a clean polarization pattern).

Some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to mathematical operations for comparing the template polarization pattern and measured polarization patterns. In some embodiments, a subtraction or arithmetic difference between the template and anomalous polarization patterns is computed to compare the patterns. However, as shown in FIG. 4, the Fresnel equations model the non-linear relationship between incident angle and energy transmitted and energy reflected, where the shapes of the curves shift in accordance with refractive index (FIG. 4 shows example curves for a refractive index of 1.5). This non-linear change in energy reflected for similar changes in surface normals at different incident angles may make it difficult to perform comparisons between polarization patterns (e.g., comparing a template polarization pattern against a measured polarization pattern). For example, a 1 degree change in incident angle in the neighborhood of 60 degrees (e.g., an average incident angle of 60 degrees and a surface normal variation that caused a 0.5 degree change in incident angle to 60.5 degrees) would have a larger change in energy reflected than a similar change in the neighborhood of 10 degrees (e.g., an average incident angle of 0 degrees and a surface normal variation that caused a 0.5 degree change in incident angle to 0.5 degrees). In other words, these embodiments would use a linear metric for comparing a non-linear phenomenon, which may cause detectability problems in flatter neighborhoods of the curve (e.g., portions of the curve with a smaller first derivative) or may cause saturation or overflow of the signal in steeper neighborhoods of the curve (e.g., portions of the curve with a larger first derivative).

As such, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to the use of Fresnel subtraction to compute a Fresnel distance for comparing a template polarization pattern and a measured polarization pattern in a manner that that accounts for the non-linear relationship between the incident angle and the energy reflected or transmitted. Accordingly, Fresnel subtraction according to some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure is a non-linear operator that admits linear comparison of surface normals. In effect, Fresnel subtraction linearizes the curve shown in FIG. 4, enabling a relative micro-surface deviation of 30 degrees to be represented with a consistent anomaly score (e.g., an anomaly score computed in accordance with a Fresnel distance), whether the original orientation was at 0° or 60° (e.g., average incident angle over the surface). In other words, a Fresnel distance is computed using a Fresnel subtraction in accordance with embodiments of present disclosure, where the Fresnel distance between two polarization patterns is substantially independent of the original orientation of the surface (e.g., substantially independent of the average incident angle over the surface). In some embodiments of the present disclosure, a Fresnel subtraction function is parametrically learned using the pattern matching technique of symbolic regression. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, a Fresnel subtraction function is numerically approximated based on the known Fresnel equations in accordance with the refractive index of the material and the orientation of the surface, such as by dividing the measured reflected light by the percentage of energy reflected at the approximate incident angle of light on the surface (e.g., the average incident angle over a substantially planar local patch of the surface), based on an assumption that the variation of the surface normal is small enough to be within a substantially or sufficiently linear neighborhood of the curve. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, closed form equations are derived based on prior knowledge of the material properties, such as the refractive index of the material.

Because the Fresnel equations are refractive index dependent, Fresnel Subtraction is also dependent on the refractive index of the material (e.g., the shapes of the curves shown in FIG. 4 shift in accordance with the refractive index). Manufactured parts may have different refractive indexes in different patches (e.g., on different surfaces). In some embodiments of the present disclosure, a standard refractive index is selected based on balancing the sensitivity needs with respect to different surfaces of the object in accordance with the application (e.g., the contact surfaces of manufactured parts may be more important than non-contact surfaces of those manufactured parts, and therefore a refractive index closer to that of the contact surfaces may be selected). For example, the standard refractive index may be set to 1.5 and assumed to be sufficiently close.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, local calibration with the design surface normals is performed to determine a locally smooth refractive index for each patch, thereby enabling a higher precision Fresnel Subtraction that is tailored for each patch. In some embodiments, local calibration is performed by assuming that the refractive index is a scalar constant that does not vary across different pixels and using information from different pixels to estimate the value of the refractive index for a given material. In some embodiments, local calibration is performed by estimating refractive index values using the techniques described in the “refractive distortion” section of Kadambi, Achuta, et al. “Polarized 3d: High-quality depth sensing with polarization cues.” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2015.

As such, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to detecting defects by comparing measured feature maps or tensors extracted from polarization raw frames captured of an object under inspection against reference tensors or reference feature maps or template feature maps corresponding to reference or template objects (e.g., based on ideal surfaces from the design, such as a CAD model, or based on measurements of a known good object).

Surface Feature Detection Using Anomaly Detection Algorithms

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, surface features are detected using anomaly detection. For example, in some circumstances, some significant variation may be expected from one instance of an object under inspection to the next. For example, manufacturing processes may cause irregular and non-uniform variations in the polarization patterns exhibited by materials. While these variations may be within manufacturing tolerances, these variations may not be aligned with particular physical locations relative to the object as a whole. For example, glass window may exhibit some inconsistent polarization patterns from one window to the next, in accordance with the cooling process of the particular sheet of glass. However, the inconsistency in the polarization patterns may make it difficult to detect defects. For example, if a “reference” glass window is used to generate a template polarization pattern, differences between this template polarization pattern and a measured polarization pattern from another glass window may cause the detection of defects if the threshold is set too low, but if the threshold is set higher, then defects may go undetected. Some embodiments use an adaptive threshold and/or a threshold that is set based on physics-based priors. For example, if the surface is curved, then regions with high curvature are more likely to have stronger polarization signals. Therefore, in some embodiments, the threshold for this region is set differently than for a region that is estimated or expected to be flat. This adaptive thresholding can be very large (e.g., the threshold may differ by orders of magnitude between different surfaces), as the polarization strength can vary by two orders of magnitude between surfaces which appear mostly flat versus curved.

Accordingly, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to an anomaly detection approach to detecting surface features in objects. For example, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, tensors in representation space are extracted from a large collection of known good reference samples. These reference tensors in representation space may differ from one another in accordance with natural variation (e.g., natural variations in their polarization patterns). Accordingly, one or more summary metrics can be computed on these reference tensors in representation space to cluster the various reference tensors, such as computing maxima and minima of DOLP, or characterizing the distribution of AOLP across different portions of the surface, or the smoothness of transitions in different levels of DOLP. The statistical distributions of these summary metrics of the set of known good objects may then be stored as a part of a stored model 810 for characterizing a surface.

In these embodiments of the present disclosure, based on this approach, the stored model 810 includes an anomaly detection model as a statistical model for commonly expected characteristics of a particular surface of the object that is loaded based on registration of the raw polarization frames 18 (or the computed tensors in representations spaces 50), similar summary metrics are computed from measurements are performed on the computed tensors 50 from the surface under inspection. If these summary metrics for the surface under inspection are within the distribution of metrics from the known good samples as represented in the anomaly detection model, then this particular portion of the surface may be marked as being clean or defect free. On the other hand, if one or more of these measurements is outside of the distribution of measurements (e.g., more than a threshold distance away from the distribution of known good samples, such as more than two standard deviations away from the mean) then the surface may be marked as containing a defect.

Surface Characteristic Detection Using Trained Convolutional Neural Networks

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the stored models 810 include trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that are trained to detect one or more defects in the surfaces of the objects based on the supplied tensors in representation spaces. These CNNs may be trained based on labeled training data (e.g., data in which training tensors in the representation spaces are used to train the weights of connections it the neural network to compute outputs that label defective portions in accordance with labeled training data).

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the models are implemented using one or more of: encoder-decoder neural networks, or U-net architectures for semantic segmentation of defects. A U-net enables multiscale information to be propagated. In some embodiments of the present disclosure, a CNN architecture for semantic segmentation and/or instance segmentation is trained using polarization training data (e.g., training data including polarization raw frames as training input and segmentation masks as labeled training output).

One embodiment of the present disclosure using deep instance segmentation is based on a modification of a Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) architecture to form a Polarized Mask R-CNN architecture. Mask R-CNN works by taking an input image x, which is an H×W×3 tensor of image intensity values (e.g., height by width by color intensity in red, green, and blue channels), and running it through a backbone network: C=B(x). The backbone network B(x) is responsible for extracting useful learned features from the input image and can be any standard CNN architecture such as AlexNet (see, e.g., Krizhevsky, Alex, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. “ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.” Advances in neural information processing systems. 2012.), VGG (see, e.g., Simonyan, Karen, and Andrew Zisserman. “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).), ResNet-101 (see, e.g., Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 770-778, 2016.), MobileNet (see, e.g., Howard, Andrew G., et al. “Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 (2017).), MobileNetV2 (see, e.g., Sandler, Mark, et al. “MobileNetV2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks.” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018.), and MobileNetV3 (see, e.g., Howard, Andrew, et al. “Searching for MobileNetV3.” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2019.)

The backbone network B(x) outputs a set of tensors, e.g.,

={

₁,

₂,

₃,

₄,

₅}, where each tensor

_(i) represents a different resolution feature map. These feature maps are then combined in a feature pyramid network (FPN) (see, e.g., Tsung-Yi Lin, Piotr Doll'ar, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, Bharath Hariharan, and Serge Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2117-2125, 2017.), processed with a region proposal network (RPN) (see, e.g., Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 91-99, 2015.), and finally passed through an output subnetwork (see, e.g., Ren et al. and He et al., above) to produce classes, bounding boxes, and pixel-wise segmentations. These are merged with non-maximum suppression for instance segmentation.

In some embodiments, a Mask R-CNN architecture is used as a component of a Polarized Mask R-CNN architecture that is configured to take several input tensors, including tensors in polarization representation spaces, and to compute multi-scale second tensors in second representation spaces. In some embodiments, the tensors in the different first representation spaces are referred to as being in different “modes,” and the tensors of each mode may be supplied to a separate Mask R-CNN backbone for each mode. Each of these backbones computes mode tensors at multiple scales or resolutions (e.g., corresponding to different scaled versions of the input first tensors), and the mode tensors computed at each scale for the different modes are fused to generate a fused tensor for each of the scales. The fused tensors or second tensors may then be supplied to a prediction module, which is trained to compute a prediction (e.g., identification of surface characteristics) based on the fused tensors or second tensors. A Polarized Mask R-CNN architecture is described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/001,445, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Mar. 29, 2020 and in International Patent Application No. PCT/US20/48604, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Aug. 28, 2020, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.

While some embodiments of the present disclosure relate to surface characterization using a Polarized CNN architecture that includes a Mask R-CNN backbone, embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto, and other backbones such as AlexNet, VGG, MobileNet, MobileNetV2, MobileNetV3, and the like may be modified in a similar manner in place of one or more (e.g., in place of all) of the Mask R-CNN backbones.

Accordingly, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, surface characterization results 20 are computed by supplying the first tensors, including tensors in polarization feature representation spaces, to a trained convolutional neural network (CNN), such as a Polarized Mask R-CNN architecture, to compute a segmentation map, where the segmentation map identifies locations or portions of the input images (e.g., the input polarization raw frames) that correspond to particular surface characteristics (e.g., surface defects such as cracks, dents, uneven paint, the presence of surface contaminants, and the like or surface features such as surface smoothness versus roughness, surface flatness versus curvature, and the like).

Surface Characteristic Detection Using Classifiers

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, rather than use a convolutional neural network to identify regions of the surface under inspection that contain various surface characteristics of interest (e.g., that contain defects), the model 810 includes a trained classifier that classifies the given input into one or more categories. For example, a trained classifier may compute a characterization output 20 that includes a vector having a length equal to the number of different possible surface characteristics that the classifier is trained to detect, where each value in the vector corresponds to a confidence that the input image depicts the corresponding surface characteristic.

A classifier may be trained to take input images of a fixed size, where the inputs may be computed by, for example, extracting first tensors in first representation spaces from the raw polarization frames and supplying the entire first tensors as input to the classifier or dividing the first tensors into fixed size blocks. In various embodiments of the present disclosure, the classifier may include, for example, a support vector machine, a deep neural network (e.g., a deep fully connected neural network), and the like.

Training Data for Training Statistical Models

Some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure relate to preparing training data for training statistical models for detecting surface features. In some circumstances, manually labeled (e.g., human labeled) training data may be available, such as in the form of manually capturing polarization raw frames of the surface of an object using a polarization camera and labeling regions of the images as containing surface characteristics of interest (e.g., borders between different types of materials, locations of defects such as dents and cracks, or surface irregularities such as rough portions of a surface that is expected to be smooth). These manually labeled training data may be used as part of a training set for training a statistical model such as an anomaly detector or a convolutional neural network as described above.

While manually labeled training data is generally considered to be good training data, there may be circumstances in which this manually labeled data may be insufficiently large to train a good statistical model. As such, some aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure further relate to augmenting a training data set, which may include synthesizing additional training data.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, computer graphics techniques are used to synthesize training object data with and without the surface characteristics of interest. For example, when training a detector to detect surface defects, polarization raw frames of defect-free surfaces may be combined with polarization raw frames depicting defects such as cracks, chips, burrs, uneven paint, and the like. These separate images may be combined using computer graphics techniques (e.g., image editing tools to programmatically clone or composite the polarization raw frame images of the defects onto the polarization raw frames of defect-free surfaces to simulate or synthesize polarization raw frames of surfaces containing defects). The composited defects may be placed on physically reasonable locations of the clean surfaces (e.g., an image of a dent in a door panel is composited into images of portions of door panels that can be dented and not placed in physically unrealistic areas such as on glass windows, likewise, a chip in a glass surface may be composited into glass surfaces but not onto images of plastic trim).

As another example, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, a generative adversarial network (GAN) is trained to generate synthesized data, where a generative network is trained to synthesize polarization raw frames of surfaces depicting defects and a judging network is trained to determine whether its inputs are genuine polarization raw frames or synthesized (e.g., by the generative network).

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, a technique known as “domain randomization” is used to add “random” image-based perturbations to the simulated or synthesized training data to make the synthesized training data more closely resemble real-world data. For example, in some embodiments of the present disclosure, rotation augmentation is applied to the training data to augment the training data with rotated versions of the various features. This may be particularly beneficial to the accuracy of detection of defects that have extreme aspect ratios (e.g., scratches) that are not well-represented in natural images.

In various embodiments of the present disclosure, a statistical model is trained using the training data based on corresponding techniques. For example, in embodiments using an anomaly detection approach, various statistics are computed on the sets of good data, such as the mean and the variance of the good data points to determine threshold distances (e.g., two standard deviations) for determining whether a given sample is acceptable or is anomalous (e.g., defective). In embodiments using a neural network such as a convolutional neural network (e.g., a Polarization Mask R-CNN), the training process may include updating the weights of connections between neurons of various layers of the neural network in accordance with a backpropagation algorithm and the use of gradient descent to iteratively adjust the weights to minimize an error (or loss) between the output of the neural network and the labeled training data.

As such, aspects of embodiments of the present disclosure provide systems and methods for automatic characterization of surfaces, such as for the automated inspection of manufactured parts as they roll off the assembly line. These automation processes enable cost savings for manufacturers, not only through automation and consequent reduction of manual labor in inspection, but also through robust and accurate handling of anomalies in the products themselves (e.g., automatically removing defective products from a manufacturing stream).

While the present invention has been described in connection with certain exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, and equivalents thereof. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-implemented method for surface modeling, the method comprising: receiving one or more polarization raw frames of a surface of a physical object, the polarization raw frames being captured at different polarizations by a polarization camera comprising a polarizing filter; extracting one or more first tensors in one or more polarization representation spaces from the polarization raw frames; and detecting a surface characteristic of the surface of the physical object based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces, comprising: loading a stored model corresponding to a location of the surface of the physical object, the stored model comprising one or more reference tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces; and computing the surface characteristic in accordance with the stored model and the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces comprising computing a difference between the one or more reference tensors and the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.
 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces comprise: a degree of linear polarization (DOLP) image in a DOLP representation space; and an angle of linear polarization (AOLP) image in an AOLP representation space.
 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the one or more first tensors further comprise one or more non-polarization tensors in one or more non-polarization representation spaces, and wherein the one or more non-polarization tensors comprise one or more intensity images in intensity representation space.
 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the one or more intensity images comprise: a first color intensity image; a second color intensity image; and a third color intensity image.
 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the surface characteristic comprises a detection of a defect in the surface of the physical object.
 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the difference is computed using a Fresnel distance.
 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the stored model comprises a trained statistical model configured to compute a prediction of the surface characteristic based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.
 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the trained statistical model comprises an anomaly detection model.
 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the trained statistical model comprises a convolutional neural network trained to detect defects in the surface of the physical object.
 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the trained statistical model comprises a trained classifier trained to detect defects.
 11. A system for surface modeling, the system comprising: a polarization camera comprising a polarizing filter, the polarization camera being configured to capture polarization raw frames at different polarizations; and a processing system comprising a processor and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to: receive one or more polarization raw frames of a surface of a physical object, the polarization raw frames corresponding to different polarizations of light; extract one or more first tensors in one or more polarization representation spaces from the polarization raw frames; and detect a surface characteristic of the surface of the physical object based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces, the instructions further comprising instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to detect the stored characteristic by: loading a stored model corresponding to a location of the surface of the physical object, the stored model comprising one or more reference tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces; and computing the surface characteristic in accordance with the stored model and the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces by computing a difference between the one or more reference tensors and the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces comprise: a degree of linear polarization (DOLP) image in a DOLP representation space; and an angle of linear polarization (AOLP) image in an AOLP representation space.
 13. The system claim 11, wherein the one or more first tensors further comprise one or more non-polarization tensors in one or more non-polarization representation spaces, and wherein the one or more non-polarization tensors comprise one or more intensity images in intensity representation space.
 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the one or more intensity images comprise: a first color intensity image; a second color intensity image; and a third color intensity image.
 15. The system of claim 11, wherein the surface characteristic comprises a detection of a defect in the surface of the physical object.
 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the difference is computed using a Fresnel distance.
 17. The system of claim 11, wherein the stored model comprises a trained statistical model configured to compute a prediction of the surface characteristic based on the one or more first tensors in the one or more polarization representation spaces.
 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the trained statistical model comprises an anomaly detection model.
 19. The system of claim 17, wherein the trained statistical model comprises a convolutional neural network trained to detect defects in the surface of the physical object.
 20. The system of claim 17, wherein the trained statistical model comprises a trained classifier trained to detect defects. 